How do you prove limit of #14-5x=4# as #x->2# using the precise definition of a limit?
↳Redirected from
"Question #f8633"
Using #epsilon-delta# definition of limits:
#14-5x=4=>10-5x=0#
Let #f(x)=10-5x#
Thus:
#lim_(x->2)10-5x=0#
Algebraically, this makes sense; yet we want to prove this using the precise definition of a limit.
Since the general formula looks like:
#lim_(x->a)f(x)=L#
This implies that:
#forallepsilon>0, existsdelta>0# such that
#0<|x-a|< delta=>|f(x)-L| < epsilon#
This means that as we pick an interval on the x-axis that is close to #a#there will be an interval on the y-axis that is close to #L#.
So, if we plug in the values we know:
#0<|x-2|< delta =>|(10-5x)-0|< epsilon#
We want to manipulate #|f(x)-L|< epsilon#
so that it can represent #delta# as a function of #epsilon#.
#|10-5x|< epsilon => |-5||x-2|< epsilon=> |x-2|< epsilon/5#
Now they look similar and we can see that #delta = epsilon/5#
This gives us a ratio for when you're given a distance from #L# (or an error tolerance).
So, lets choose #delta = epsilon/5# and plug it back into our delta function.
#0<|x-2|< epsilon/5#
#0<5|x-2|< epsilon#
#0<|5x-10|< epsilon => |f(x)-L|< epsilon#
That concludes our proof.