Well, for one, "NI" doesn't exist (on the other hand, "NI"_3 has been witnessed; "PF"_3 exists, so by implication of elements on the same column of the periodic table being similar in valence electronic behavior, "NF"_3 exists, and thus, so might "NI"_3).
Despite both of their ("N", "I") natural oxidation states being negative, the least you could have is charge magnitudes matching, which would require more than one "I" atom bonded to "N". If it did exist in this unrealistic exercise, it would be different in that it has two elements.
"Ni" is the nickel atom, and clearly, there is only one element in one atom, because every atom derives from a single element (a neutral atom IS the element).