Question #7f7c0
1 Answer
Here's why that is the case.
Explanation:
The first thing to note here is that equivalent mass is not unitless. In this case, the equivalent mass of sulfur dioxide is actually
Now, the trick here is to realize that you're dealing with a redox reaction, so start by assigning oxidation numbers to the atoms that take part in the reaction
#stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H") _ 2stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("S") + stackrel(color(blue)(+4))("S") stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O")_ 2 -> stackrel(color(blue)(+1)) ("H")_ 2 stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O") + stackrel(color(blue)(0))("S")#
Notice that sulfur is being oxidized and reduced.
The oxidation half-reaction looks like this
#stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("S") ""^(2-) -> stackrel(color(blue)(0))("S") + 2"e"^(-)#
The reduction half-reaction looks like this
#stackrel(color(blue)(+4))("S") ""^(4+) + 4"e"^(-) -> stackrel(color(blue)(0))("S")#
Now, notice that when hydrogen sulfide gets oxidized, the sulfur atom loses
In other words, when this reaction takes place, every mole of hydrogen sulfide will lose
Now, in the context of a redox reaction, the equivalent mass of a compound is taken to be the mass of said compound that can either supply or react with
Since every sulfur dioxide reacts with
#1 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("mole e"^(-)))) * "1 mole SO"_2/(4color(red)(cancel(color(black)("moles e"^(-))))) = 1/4color(white)(.)"moles SO"_2#
Since sulfur dioxide has a molar mass of about
#1/4 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("moles SO"_2))) * "64 g"/(1color(red)(cancel(color(black)("mole SO"_2)))) = "16 g"#
And there you have it -- the equivalent mass of sulfur dioxide for this reaction is