If f(x) = { (x^2, x !=2), (2, x=2) :} then evaluate lim_(x rarr 2) f(x)?

2 Answers
Jul 27, 2017

lim_(x rarr 2) f(x) = 4

Explanation:

In order to evaluate a limit we are not interested in the value of the function at the limit, just the behaviour of the function around the limit:

We have:

f(x) = { (x^2, x !=2), (2, x=2) :}

If we graphed the function would be the parabola y=x^2 with a hole at x=2.

If we just examine the behaviour close to x=2, e.g x=2+-0.001 we get:

f(2-0.001) = f(1.999) = 3.996001
f(2+0.001) = f(2.001) = 4.004001
f(2) = 2

Which would certainly "suggest" that lim_(x rarr 2) f(x) is 4 rather than 2. We can show thi is the case analytically as follows by studying the limit either side of x=2:

The Left Handed limit:

lim_(x rarr 2^-) f(x) = lim_(x rarr 2^-) x^2
" " = 2^2
" " = 4

And The Right Handed limit:

lim_(x rarr 2^+) f(x) = lim_(x rarr 2^+) x^2
" " = 2^2
" " = 4

And as both limits are identical we have:

lim_(x rarr 2^) f(x) = 4

In both cases we chose the "x^2" variant of the function as x rarr 2 but x != 2

Jul 27, 2017

Please see the discussion below.

Explanation:

One way to think about the limit of a function as x approaches 2 is that it is the value you would expect if you looked at the graph but covered up the graph where x = 2.

The limit wants to know "for values of x near 2, is the value of f(x) (think of it as y) close to just one number. And if so, what number is that?

The limit, lim_(xrarr2)f(x) doesn't care what happens when x = 2, just what happens when x is close to 2

The question of what happens whar x equals two is the question of the value of f(2). In your example, f(2) = 4 but for x near 2 (and not equal to 2) f(x) = x^2 is close to 4. So that is the limit.

Finally, functions like the one in this question (kind of strange, with weird points) are very important to learning the difference between:

"Find f(a)" and "Find lim_(xrarra)f(x)"